check to have links open new windows

Friday, December 30, 2005

He's listening!

Back to the news-

President publicly admits to authorizing illegal wiretaps.
Investigation to come...


Only the investigation is about who told the press about the "top secret" illegal wiretap program...

Our local newspaper just held an online poll that asked if the president should be able to wiretap anybody he wants without congressional approval, and 59% of these gomers thought it was a great idea.

Just so you know, it's a bad idea. The wiretaps the president said he authorized would have been authorized by FISA. I know the right-wing doesnt think we should use our traditional legal system against people it deems "enemies of the state," but these are precisely the cases that it is most important to follow the rule of law. Arbitrary imprisonment by the executive is something expressly forbidden by the constitution.

Now, because these illegal wiretaps were used against some of our enemies, we have made it more difficult to do away with them. The system favors those of us who follow the law. (it's set up that way to protet us from an overzealous executive. Brilliant, really.)

It's hard to change the constitution, but it can be changed through the amendment process. It takes years and a wide consensus of public opinion to get it to happen, but it can happen. If you think you can sustain public support for unlimited executive power for as long as it takes to ratify an amendment to the constitution, go ahead and try.

But for now, follow the law.

So the story is that the president decided to do something illegally that could have been done legally? Unlikely. More likely is these retreads from the Nixon administration are up to their old tricks again. I would love to see the actual list of peoople who were spied on, of course that's probably top secret too.

There have always been people who sought our destruction. There have always been those with the will and the power to injure us. Giving up our traditions of liberty and privacy will not aid our defense, they will make it both more difficult and less important.

And FURTHERMORE,

To the listeners of right-wing radio everywhere:

FISA can approve wiretap warrents retroactively, so there is never a waiting period or backlog of requests. There is never a reason for the government to say it didn't have time for a warrant.

Oh, and your supreme court judges, the ones who know the "original intent" of the framers of the constitution? Don't you think they'll have a problem with this?

What are you made out of? Sugar candy? One attack in 60 years and you're ready to wet yourselves, and toss away your liberty to the first strongman who offers you protection?

And most important for you to remember-
Hilary Clinton could be president someday... do you want her to have all these new powers, too?

2 Comments:

Blogger JC said...

Over on right-wing radio, they're parroting the president's excuse that the FISA court couldn't have issued enough warrants in time for the NSA to spy on these phone calls.

The truth is, the FISA statute allows the government to ask for a warrant after the wiretap is done.

From a civil liberties point of view, the FISA court is a bit questionable, but it is a process of law, something that the system used by the president is not.

A wiretap approved by a FISA court could be used as evidence in a criminal court.

The NSA spying on your calls withoug a warrant can't be.

So my question is, why would the current administration break the law when it wasn't necessary to do what they say they're doing? (in fact, it's self-defeating)

The answer, of course, is they're probably up to some real mischief...

Or shennanigans.

Or possibly,

Just possibly,

skull-duggery.

Tue Jan 03, 07:51:00 PM EST  
Blogger Unknown said...

Yet again I find myself, the man who has voted Republican in most of the elections of the last ten years, agreeing with you JC. Something stinks to high heaven here. There is no legitimate reason not to hold any government surveillance of its own citizens up to some form of legal scrutiny. The FISA may not be entirely palatable to those of us who believe in civil liberty but it at least keeps the NSA under review. Without that they have absolute power. And we all know, "Absolute power corrupts absolutely."

Thu Jan 05, 09:10:00 PM EST  

Post a Comment

<< Home